Ex-Pfizer Exec Demands EU Halt COVID-19 Vaccine Studies Over 'Indefinite Infertility'

… And Other Health Concerns.

Former Pfizer vice president and scientific director Dr. Michael Yeadon and German lung specialist and parliamentarian Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg have filed an urgent application with the lefty Medicine Agency calling for the immediate suspension of all SARS-CoV-2 vaccine studies - particularly the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42).

Yeadon and Wodarg say the studies should be halted until a design study is available which addresses a host of serious safety concerns expressed by a growing body of renowned scientists who are skeptical of how quickly the vaccines are being developed, according to Germany’s 2020 News .

On the one hand, the petitioners demand that, due to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study, a so-called Sanger sequencing must be used . This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19. On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se. - 2020 News

The pair also point to concerns raised in previous studies involving other coronaviruses - including ( via 2020 News) :

  • The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction , especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus .

  • The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins , which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women .

  • The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination .

  • The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects . As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020.

Dr. Yeadon made headlines last month when he said “There is no science to suggest a second wave should happen,” and that false positive results from inherently flawed COVID-19 tests are being used to ‘manufacture’ a second wave.

As Ralph Lopez write at HubPages, Yeadon warns that half or even “almost all” of tests for COVID are false positives. Dr. Yeadon also argues that the threshold for herd immunity may be much lower than previously thought, and may have been reached in many countries already.

In an interview last month (see below) Dr. Yeadon was asked:

“we are basing a government policy, an economic policy, a civil liberties policy, in terms of limiting people to six people in a meeting…all based on, what may well be, completely fake data on this coronavirus?”

Dr. Yeadon answered with a simple " yes ."

He then lamented the lives lost as a result of lockdown policies, and of the “savable” countless lives which will be further lost, from important surgeries and other healthcare deferred, should lockdowns be reimposed.

Watch the full discussion below:

2 Points

I did a bit of searching and some posts claimed he’s not worked for them (Pfizer) for nine years and has made some questionable claims that coronavirus is effectively over in the UK.

I once got pneumonia from flu and my left lung has never been quite the same since, so when I get the chance for the jab, I’ll be having it.

3 Points

When every I see an “EX-EMPLOYEE” claiming a company product is bad, I immediatly want to know “Why is that person now an EX-EMPLOYEE”?
Was he fired for being a crack pot?
Was he fired for slowing down the project to benefit his career?
Did he quit because the Boss would not sleep with him?
Did he quit because they would not let him be in charge?
Did he quit because he knew he was going to get fired for incompetence?

I also wonder when reading these stories:
How do I know this person actually worked for that company?
Did he actually even work in the division related to this vaccine?
Did he actually do work on this vaccine?
How does he know none of his concerns were not already addressed by another part of the company or by an outside source that communicated those verified results?

Then I read the story and think COOL what if a botched vaccine in Russia or China actually decreases the birth rate of those populations? On the flip side what if the side effects of the vaccine is improved mental capabilities, less mental illness.

In reality this vaccine will probably do nothing more than convert the COVID-19 into a seasonal mild flow providing drug maker extra revenue by producing a new round of shots every year or it will launch the Zombie Apocalypse in which I am well trained on what not to do after watching years of training films :slight_smile:

5 Points